1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 223 F.3d
  5. 223 F.3d 377 (2000)
 

U.S. v. ROBERTS

No. 98-4091.

223 F.3d 377 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James ROBERTS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: July 28, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph D. Reed (briefed), Columbus, OH, for Appellant.

Daniel Allen Brown (briefed), U.S. Attorney, Columbus, OH, for Appellee.

Before: JONES, MOORE, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the district court properly denied defendant-appellant James Roberts, Jr.'s request for a downward adjustment to his base offense level for a mitigating role in the offense pursuant to § 3B1.2 of the Sentencing Guidelines. Because Roberts's base offense level was predicated only upon acts of distribution in which he personally played a substantial role, we AFFIRM...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases