The replacement of ceiling tiles in a school building by the plaintiffs, "maintenance mechanics" employed by the Board of Education of the City of New York, was routine maintenance, and not part of the renovation work that had previously been performed by various contractors and subcontractors or that was ongoing in other parts of the building, and therefore plaintiffs' claims under Labor Law § 240 (1) were properly dismissed (see, Joblon v Solow,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CULLEN v. UPTOWN STORAGE CO., INC.
268 A.D.2d 327 (2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 244
EDWARD CULLEN et al., Appellants, v. UPTOWN STORAGE CO., INC., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) UPTOWN STORAGE CO., INC., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. CAMILLE ABBAMONTE, Appellant, v. UPTOWN STORAGE CO., INC., et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.) (Action No. 2.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 20, 2000.
Decided January 20, 2000.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.