1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 237 Wis.2d
  5. 237 Wis.2d 358 (2000)
 

STATE v. HINDSLEY

No. 99-1374-CR.

237 Wis.2d 358 (2000)

2000 WI App 130

614 N.W.2d 48

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. George W. HINDSLEY, Defendant-Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided May 11, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant-cross-respondent, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Scott Roberts, assistant district attorney, of Stevens Point.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent-cross-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of James B. Connell of Crooks, Low, Connell & Rottier, S. C. of Wausau.

Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Deininger, JJ.

¶ 1. VERGERONT, J.

The State of Wisconsin appeals from an order of the circuit court suppressing a statement of George Hindsley on the ground that the State did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Hindsley, who is deaf, was adequately informed of his Miranda rights1 and knowingly and intelligently waived them. The State contends the trial court erred because its findings of fact are clearly erroneous in that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases