1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 91 F.Supp.2d
  5. 91 F.Supp.2d 492 (2000)
 

MORMILE v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO.

No. 3:97CV1509(WWE).

91 F.Supp.2d 492 (2000)

Robert A. MORMILE, Jr., Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Certain Retirement Incentive Plan Offered to Robert Mormile, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Retirement Plan and The Metlife Temporary Disability Plan, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 1, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Judy Duncan Rintoul, David S. Rintoul, Glastonbury, CT, for plaintiff.

Thomas F. Maxwell, Jr., Pullman & Comley, Bridgeport, CT, for defendants.

RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Robert Mormile, a thirty year employee of defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("Metlife"), brings this action alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), breach of contract and promissory estoppel. Pending is the defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. # 21] on all five counts of the plaintiff's complaint.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases