CRUZ v. BRIDGE HARBOR HEIGHTS ASSOCIATES


274 A.D.2d 309 (2000)

710 N.Y.S.2d 361

VICTOR R. CRUZ, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. BRIDGE HARBOR HEIGHTS ASSOCIATES et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. MANHATTAN SKYLINE MANAGEMENT CORP., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v. MICHAEL HOSZOWSKI, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided July 6, 2000.


The verdict for future pain and suffering deviates materially from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances (CPLR 5501 [c]) and we reduce it accordingly (see, CPLR 5501 [c]; Cruz v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 259 A.D.2d 432). We also find that the judgment, to the extent that it awarded plaintiff $600,000 for future lost earnings, was not supportable on this record.

We see no reason...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases