1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 268 A.D.2d
  5. 268 A.D.2d 307 (2000)
 

PEOPLE v. NEAL

268 A.D.2d 307 (2000)

701 N.Y.S.2d 393

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD NEAL, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 18, 2000.

Defendant's claims that the court failed to meaningfully respond to the jury's requests for a rereading of the charges and failed to follow the procedures set forth in People v O'Rama (78 N.Y.2d 270, 277-278) are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. We do not find the O'Rama exception to the preservation requirement to be applicable (see, People v Starling, 85 N.Y.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases