SRIVASTAVA v. C.I.R.

No. 99-60437.

220 F.3d 353 (2000)

Sudhir P. SRIVASTAVA and Elizabeth S. Pascual, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 19, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Dale Cropper (argued), Midland, TX, for Petitioners-Appellants.

Kenneth W. Rosenberg (argued), Richard Bradshaw Farber, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, DC, for C.I.R.

Henry Binder, Porter & Hedges, Houston, TX, for Texas Trial Lawyers Ass'n, Amicus Curiae.

Before POLITZ, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.


JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

This challenge to a notice of deficiency requires us to determine whether the portion of a judgment or settlement payable to a taxpayer's attorney pursuant to a contingent fee agreement governed by Texas law constitutes gross income under § 61 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 61. Following Cotnam v. Commissioner, 263 F.2d 119 (5th Cir.1959), which excluded from gross income...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases