PALCHIK v. EISENBERG


278 A.D.2d 293 (2000)

718 N.Y.S.2d 203

FAINA PALCHIK, Appellant, v. MORDECHAI EISENBERG et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided December 11, 2000.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly struck the testimony of the plaintiff's expert, since it went beyond the scope of the allegations contained in the bill of particulars (see, Ciriello v Virgues, 156 A.D.2d 417).

Moreover, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for judgment in their favor as a matter of law since the plaintiff failed to establish a prima...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases