BAUGHMAN v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. 99-556.

88 Ohio St.3d 480 (2000)

BAUGHMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 24, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nurenberg, Plevin, Heller & McCarthy Co., L.P.A., David M. Paris and Kathleen J. St. John; and Lawrence A. Sutter, for appellants.

Baker & Hostetler, L.L.P., Mark A. Johnson and Elizabeth A. McNellie; Davis & Young and Henry A. Hentemann, for appellee.


ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

The issue presented is whether the trial court abused

its discretion in granting class certification. Stated more precisely, the issue is whether the trial court's findings with regard to the satisfaction of either Civ.R. 23(A)(3)'s requirement of typicality or Civ.R. 23(B)(3)'s requirement of predominance and superiority constitute an abuse of discretion.

I

STANDARD OF REVIEW

Appellants propose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases