1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 107 F.Supp.2d
  5. 107 F.Supp.2d 459 (2000)
 

HOGAN v. METROMAIL

No. 99 CIV. 11204 VM.

107 F.Supp.2d 459 (2000)

John HOGAN and Stewart Rosen, Plaintiffs, v. METROMAIL, Experian Marketing Solutions, and Metromail Corp. Special Service Plan, Defendants

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 9, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janice Goodman, Goodman & Zuchlewski, L.L.P., New York, NY, for plaintiffs.

Andrew T. Hahn, Winston & Strawn, Lawrence R. Sandak, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, New York, NY, for defendants.

DECISION AND ORDER

MARRERO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs John Hogan and Stuart Rosen ("Hogan and Rosen") bring this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 621; the New York Executive Law §§ 290 et seq. ("State HRL"); the New York City Administrative Code §§ 8-107(1)(a) and (c), and 8-107(17) ("City HRL"); and § 502(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases