As the People correctly concede, the sentencing court unlawfully imposed consecutive sentences for defendant's convictions on two counts of grand larceny, and two counts of criminal possession of stolen property, respectively, in the absence of evidence that defendant's acts were separate and distinct as to each count in the respective indictments. Accordingly, concurrent sentences must be imposed for each of those pairs of convictions. However, we perceive no abuse of sentencing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
