IORIZZO v. DYKER EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS, P.C.


278 A.D.2d 280 (2000)

718 N.Y.S.2d 215

PATRICIA IORIZZO et al., Appellants, v. DYKER EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS, P. C., et al., Defendants, and KASTHURI ISSACK et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided December 11, 2000.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The injured plaintiff's insurance claim form was admitted into evidence without objection. Consequently, the question of whether there was a proper foundation for its admission is unpreserved for appellate review.

The trial court's issuance of a missing witness charge with respect to the injured plaintiff's treating physician was a provident exercise of discretion (see, Dukes v Rotem,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases