MATTER OF CITRIN


94 N.Y.2d 459 (2000)

727 N.E.2d 569

706 N.Y.S.2d 72

In the Matter of PETER CITRIN, a Disbarred Attorney, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 30, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beldock Levine & Hoffman, L. L. P., New York City (Hal R. Lieberman, Richard Supple and Julie F. Kowitz of counsel), for appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Thomas B. Litsky, Preeta D. Bansal and Robert A. Forte of counsel), for respondent.

Michael S. Ross, New York City, for Committee on Professional Discipline of the New York County Lawyers' Association, amicus curiae.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY concur in Per Curiam opinion; Judge ROSENBLATT taking no part.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Petitioner-appellant is a disbarred attorney who has twice applied, without success, for reinstatement to the Bar. He argues that he was entitled to obtain a report that the Committee on Character and Fitness prepared in conjunction with his quest for reinstatement and provided to the Appellate Division. Petitioner wished to have the opportunity to address the concerns of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases