Respondent's decision to terminate petitioner for a three-month absence without leave that was in flagrant violation of respondent's time and leave rules was not arbitrary and capricious. Since estoppel is not available against an administrative agency for the purpose of ratifying administrative error, it does not avail petitioner that her absence was approved by an employee relations specialist in her agency, who, first, was not authorized to approve absences without leave...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
