1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 271 A.D.2d
  5. 271 A.D.2d 276 (2000)
 

CROSSLAND SAVINGS, FSB v. SUTTON EAST ASSOCIATES NO. 88

271 A.D.2d 276 (2000)

707 N.Y.S.2d 147

CROSSLAND SAVINGS, FSB, Plaintiff, v. SUTTON EAST ASSOCIATES No. 88 et al., Defendants. HARVEY SIMPSON et al., Appellants, v. SUTTON EAST ASSOCIATES No. 88, Appellant, and V.A.L. FLOORS, INC., Respondent, et al., Defendants. NAB CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al., Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 13, 2000.

There is no support in either the Lien Law or the record for appellants' claim that V.A.L.'s lien expired. V.A.L. filed its mechanic's lien on March 20, 1991. Four months later, Crossland instituted a mortgage foreclosure action joining V.A.L. as a defendant in its complaint and naming V.A.L. in its Notice of Pendency, thus continuing V.A.L.'s mechanic's lien (Lien Law § 17). Although the Notice of Pendency expired on July 22, 1994, prior to its expiration, V.A.L., in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases