SADKIN v. RASKIN & RAPPOPORT, P. C.


271 A.D.2d 272 (2000)

707 N.Y.S.2d 400

MARY SADKIN, Appellant-Respondent, v. RASKIN & RAPPOPORT, P. C., et al., Respondents, and DIAHN W. McGRATH, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 13, 2000.


A motion for summary judgment on one claim or defense does not provide a basis for searching the record and granting summary judgment on an unrelated claim or defense (Frank v City of New York, 211 A.D.2d 478, 479). Here, the Raskin defendants' motion for summary judgment was based entirely on the argument that plaintiff could not have succeeded in the underlying wrongful death action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases