CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. STIDHAM

No. 99-1156.

87 Ohio St.3d 455 (2000)

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. STIDHAM.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 5, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sandra P. Kaltman and David T. Croall, for relator.

H. Fred Hoefle, for respondent.


ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

We adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, but not its recommendation. Respondent principally takes issue with two aspects of the board's report, and so objects to the board's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended sanction. Respondent's major points of contention involve (1) some of the board's findings of fact and conclusions of law in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases