The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The evidence warrants the conclusion that when defendant struck the complainant and grabbed a chain from his neck, he intended to commit robbery and not just assault. Furthermore, there was ample evidence that another person aided in the commission of the robbery.
The court's...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
