1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 272 A.D.2d
  5. 272 A.D.2d 266 (2000)
 

MATTER OF ORTIZ v. HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK

272 A.D.2d 266 (2000)

708 N.Y.S.2d 95

In the Matter of PEDRO R. ORTIZ et al., Appellants, v. HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 30, 2000.

Respondent's decision not to alter its reinstatement agreement with petitioner by eliminating the condition that petitioner not employ his son in his business was not arbitrary and capricious. Such decision was rationally based on the fraud that petitioner's son had committed against the food stamp program when employed by petitioner, and on a reasonable reading of the condition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases