SCHNALL v. HERTZ CORP.

No. A083939.

93 Cal.Rptr.2d 439 (2000)

78 Cal.App.4th 1144

Peter SCHNALL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HERTZ CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

Review Denied June 2, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Coffino, Robert A. Zeavin, Arthur J. Friedman, Tatro, Coffino, Zeaven & Bloomgarden, LLP, San Francisco, for Appellant.

Peter S. Hecker, Anna S. McLean, Daniel K. Slaughter, M. Claire Fehrenbacher, Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe, San Francisco, for Respondent.


KLINE, P.J.

Appellant Peter Schnall filed this class action1 complaint seeking damages and injunctive relief against respondent The Hertz Corporation (Hertz). His chief allegation was that, because Hertz's fuel service charge was "excessive and punitive," the rental agreement was unlawful, unfair and fraudulent within the meaning of the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof.Code, § 17200) (hereafter the UCL) and an unconscionable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases