UTILITY REFORM PROJECT v. PUC

(97C-14205; CA A103670)

16 P.3d 516 (2000)

171 Or. App. 349

UTILITY REFORM PROJECT, Lloyd K. Marbet and Laurence Tuttle, Appellants, v. OREGON PUBLIC Utility COMMISSION, Respondent, and Enron Corporation and Portland General Electric Company, Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 13, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel W. Meek, Portland, filed the brief for appellants.

Judy C. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Oregon Public Utility Commission. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Barbee B. Lyon, Portland, argued the cause for intervenors-respondents Enron Corporation and Portland General Electric Company. With him on the brief was Tonkon Torp LLP.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and BREWER, Judges.


LANDAU, P.J.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment of the trial court upholding an Oregon Public Utility Commission (Commission) order approving the acquisition of a public utility. Plaintiffs' principal contention on appeal is that the Commission approved the acquisition without first holding certain hearings that plaintiffs contend are required by statute. We affirm.

We take the following undisputed facts from the Commission's order. Portland General Corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases