Defendant's speedy trial motions were properly denied. The period from October 13, 1994 to November 17, 1994 was excludable. A fair reading of the record establishes that the attorney representing defendant for purposes of the October 13 calendar call agreed that the instant case be kept together with defendant's additional indictment, so that the adjournment of the additional case for motion practice rendered the adjournment of the instant case excludable, even though the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
