Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant argues that the admission of two 911 emergency telephone number tapes into evidence improperly bolstered the trial testimony of the witness who made those calls. However, one of the tapes was properly admitted under the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule since it contained the caller's statements concerning his observations of the defendant, made contemporaneously with those observations (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
