Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The undercover police officer did not improperly bolster his testimony regarding the subject narcotics transaction by his testimony as an expert regarding the role of a "doorman" in indoor drug sales (see, People v Peoples,
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.