CLARK v. KUHN

(98CV0665; CA A107753)

15 P.3d 37 (2000)

171 Or. App. 29

Richard CLARK, Respondent, v. Orville KUHN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 15, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Keusink, Brookings, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jesse Margolis, Gold Beach, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Olin & Margolis.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.


EDMONDS, P.J.

Plaintiff brought this declaratory judgment action to have the trial court determine the extent of an easement for ingress and egress for defendant's benefit that crosses his property. After the trial court ruled, defendant brought this appeal. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3), and affirm.

Plaintiff and defendant own adjacent property. Access to defendant's property is provided by an easement across the front of plaintiff's property. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases