The motion court properly dismissed the action and denied plaintiff's cross motion to substitute the corporate principal in place of the individual originally sought to be held liable. Although the action was brought against the individuals who negotiated the lease, rather than the corporate signatories, plaintiff knew or should have known from the outset that such individuals were acting only in a representative capacity on behalf of their respective corporate principals...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
