The record establishes that defendant received meaningful representation from his trial attorney. We note that, contrary to defendant's argument, the detectives' 1991 DD-5 reports do not suggest that the witness's attention had been drawn to the omitted matter. In any event, counsel did in fact elicit the omission and made use of it during summation. Since the challenged portions of the prosecutor's summation remarks constituted fair comment on the evidence and proper response...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.