IN RE RACHEL M.

(AC 20058)

58 Conn. App. 448 (2000)

IN RE RACHEL M.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released June 27, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael H. Agranoff, with whom, on the brief, was Stephanie L. Klaubert, law student intern, for the appellant (respondent).

Jane R. Rosenberg, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Susan T. Pearlman, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (petitioner).

Maria Morelli-Wolfe, for the minor child.

Lavery, C. J., and Hennessy and Pellegrino, JS.


Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The respondent mother appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights in her daughter, Rachel M.1 The sole issue by agreement of the parties is whether, in the disposition phase of the trial, the petitioner, the commissioner of children and families, failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence, pursuant to General Statutes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases