Two issues are raised: (1) is Rutherford's report "some evidence" supporting denial of surgical payment? and (2) if not, is a return for further consideration warranted? For the reasons to follow, we answer both questions in the negative.
Dr. Rutherford examined claimant in October 1994. Claimant's condition, at that time, was unchanged from 1992. Although still having back pain, she could do light housework and had modified...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.