1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 2 P.3d
  5. 2 P.3d 497 (2000)
 

WILEY v. REHAK

No. 24478-1-II.

2 P.3d 497 (2000)

101 Wash.App. 198

Leslie WILEY, Appellant, v. Dana REHAK and Kevin Prueitt, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

June 16, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ben Shafton, Morse & Bratt, Vancouver, for Appellant.

Heidi Nuss Imhof, Krilich La Porte West & Lockner, Tacoma, for Respondents.

SEINFELD, J.

This case presents the question of whether, under the Mandatory Arbitration Rules, a trial court may allow an aggrieved party to add its name to a request for a trial de novo after the expiration of the time for seeking such a trial. Because the Supreme Court in Nevers v. Fireside, Inc., 133 Wn.2d 804, 947 P.2d 721 (1997), overruling O'Neill v. Jacobs,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases