The motion was properly denied since defendant, who had a full service contract to maintain and repair the elevators at plaintiff's employer's premises, failed to meet its initial burden of establishing as a matter of law that it exercised "reasonable care to discover and correct a condition which it ought to have found" (Rogers v Dorchester Assocs.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MEZON v. DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY
272 A.D.2d 227 (2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 75
GABRIEL MEZON et al., Respondents, v. DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 23, 2000.
Decided May 23, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.