Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant's motion to vacate the judgment entered July 15, 1998, upon its default in appearing or answering (see, Roussodimou v Zafiriadis,
The Supreme Court also properly denied the plaintiff's motion to stay enforcement of the judgment entered October 10, 1997, in...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.