1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 102 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 102 Cal.Rptr.2d 392 (2000)
 

WAREMART v. PROGRESSIVE CAMPAIGNS, INC.

No. C034318.

102 Cal.Rptr.2d 392 (2000)

85 Cal.App.4th 679

WAREMART, INC., Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. PROGRESSIVE CAMPAIGNS, INC., et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants. Waremart, Inc., Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. Discovery Petition Management Co. et al., Defendants and Appellants; National Political Consultants et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants; Douglas Thane et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

Review Granted March 14, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gronemeier & Associates, Dale L. Gronemeier, Pasadena, for Defendants and Appellants.

Stoel Rives, Charles F. Hinkle, Portland, OR.; Christensen & Schwarz, Nels A. Christensen, Chico, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

No appearance for Defendants and Respondents.

SCOTLAND, P.J.

We publish this case primarily to deal with some pesky dictum in one of our prior opinions. (Bank of Stockton v. Church of Soldiers (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 1623, 52 Cal.Rptr.2d 429.) Recognizing that attorneys are resourceful advocates who will seize upon any language, including dictum, favorable to their positions, we want to ensure that what we said there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases