RISENHOOVER v. BAYER CORP. GROUP HEALTH PLAN

No. 00 Civ. 0104.

83 F.Supp.2d 408 (2000)

Judi RISENHOOVER, Plaintiff, v. BAYER CORPORATION GROUP HEALTH PLAN, Bayer Corporation and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

February 9, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gruen & Farrelly, LLP, Michael S. Gruen, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Wormser, Kiely, Galef & Jacobs, LLP, John T. Morin, New York City, for Defendants Bayer Corporation and Bayer Corporation Group Health Plan.

Harvey, Pennington, Cabot, Griffith & Renneisen, LLC, Kevin G. Horbatiuk, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant Connecticut General Life Insurance Company.

Brian P. Conway, for Defendant Bayer Corporation.


OPINION AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

Before me is the issue of an employer's obligation under a welfare plan to reimburse an employee for expensive medical treatment which the employee's treating doctor has prescribed, but which the employer's reviewing physicians do not find "medically necessary". Plaintiff Judi Risenhoover brings this suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., to enjoin defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases