Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondent payable by the appellant.
The Supreme Court correctly determined that Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc. s/h/a New Mark & Co. did not exercise control over the premises where the plaintiff was injured. As an out-of-possession landlord which was not contractually obligated to repair or maintain the premises, it was not liable for injuries occurring on the premises (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.