BOLDEN v. NEW MARK & CO.


270 A.D.2d 221 (2000)

704 N.Y.S.2d 856

YVETTE BOLDEN, Appellant, v. NEW MARK & CO., Respondent, et al., Defendant, and NEWMARK & COMPANY REAL ESTATE, INC., Sued Herein as NEW MARK & CO., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. TIMES SQUARE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT COMMITTEE, INC., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided March 6, 2000.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondent payable by the appellant.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc. s/h/a New Mark & Co. did not exercise control over the premises where the plaintiff was injured. As an out-of-possession landlord which was not contractually obligated to repair or maintain the premises, it was not liable for injuries occurring on the premises (

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases