The instant action, commenced beyond the expiration of the applicable statutory period, was properly dismissed as time-barred. Contrary to plaintiff's argument, its action is not rendered timely by CPLR former 306-b (b) since that provision was no longer in effect at the time plaintiff commenced the action. Plaintiff had no vested right to the privilege afforded by CPLR former 306-b (b).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
