There is no merit to petitioners' claim that their resignation from the NASD voided any duty they have to arbitrate respondent's claim that, as principals of respondent's employer, they caused respondent's constructive discharge in retaliation for his having reported illegal trading activities to the NASD (see, Matter of Dunay v Weisglass,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.