1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 273 A.D.2d
  5. 273 A.D.2d 209 (2000)
 

MEISELMAN v. CENTRAL SUFFOLK HOSPITAL

273 A.D.2d 209 (2000)

709 N.Y.S.2d 436

ANNETTE MEISELMAN, Appellant, v. CENTRAL SUFFOLK HOSPITAL, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 5, 2000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To avoid dismissal for failure to timely serve a complaint after a demand for the complaint has been made pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b), a plaintiff must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the delay in serving the complaint and a meritorious cause of action (see, Chmielnik v Rosenberg, 269 A.D.2d 555; Quinn v Wenco Food Sys., Co., 269 A.D.2d 437

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases