Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground of alleged deprivation of his right to testify before the Grand Jury was properly denied. Although defendant made a timely dismissal motion pursuant to CPL 190.50 (5) (c), that motion did not assert his present claim that, despite his having given timely notice to the People of his desire to appear before the Grand Jury, the prosecution never notified him of the date and time of the Grand Jury presentation. This issue...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
