CPLR 504 (3), which provides that the place of trial of an action against the City of New York shall be the county within the City where the cause of action arose, implements the public policy of giving all due consideration to the convenience of public officials, and should be complied with absent compelling countervailing circumstances (see, Powers v East Hudson Parkway Auth.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ROSE v. GROW-PERINI
271 A.D.2d 210 (2000)
706 N.Y.S.2d 326
PAUL ROSE et al., Appellants, v. GROW-PERINI, a Joint Venture, et al., Respondents. DWAYNE McCLENDON et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 4, 2000.
Decided April 4, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.