The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence, viewed as a whole, supported the inference that defendant was a participant in the sale and did not merely identify a source of drugs.
Defendant's claim that the verdict was repugnant because he was convicted of the sale charge but acquitted of possession with intent to sell is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.