1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 96 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 383 (2000)
 

DUGGAL v. G.E. CAPITAL COMMUNICATIONS

Nos. B125295, B129637.

96 Cal.Rptr.2d 383 (2000)

81 Cal.App.4th 81

Oliver DUGGAL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. G.E. CAPITAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., Defendant and Respondent. Oliver Duggal et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. AT&T Corp., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

May 31, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Raymond Hamrick, III, Universal City, and Raymond C. Dion, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

DeWitt & Roberts LLP, and David M. Roberts and Kelly C. Fitzgerald, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent G.E. Capital Communications Services, Inc.

Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro, LLP, and Jeffrey K. Riffer, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent AT & T Corp.

GODOY PEREZ, J.

Plaintiffs Oliver Duggal, Starfire Financial Services, Inc.; Michael Hauser, both individually and dba Global-Tel; and U.S. Refill-It, dba Supply Distribution Network, appeal from the judgments entered for defendants AT & T Corp. and G.E. Capital Communications Services, Inc., after their demurrers to the third amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend.1 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases