PRI-HAR v. U.S.

No. 93 CR. 278(JES). No. 96 Civ. 9577(JES).

83 F.Supp.2d 393 (2000)

Menachem PRI-HAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

February 9, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Neil Hurwitz, New York City (Neil Hurwitz, of counsel), Doar, Devorkin & Rieck, New York City (Walter Mack, of counsel), for petitioner.

Mary Jo White, United States Attorney, New York City, John T. McCormick, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel, Mark Stein, Special Assistant United States Attorney, for U.S.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SPRIZZO, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure ("Rule 33") and 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (" § 2255"), petitioner moves to vacate his conviction or, alternatively, for an order granting a new trial based upon newly-discovered evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, and ineffective assistance of counsel. In addition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455(a) and 455(b)(1), petitioner moves...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases