We perceive no grounds warranting disturbance of the motion court's finding that petitioners failed to comply timely with the filing requirements set forth in CPLR 304, and since the instant proceeding was, in consequence of petitioners' filing failure, not properly commenced within the applicable four-month limitations period, it was properly dismissed as time-barred (see, Fry v Village of Tarrytown,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.