The record, which shows that the hearing was adjourned to July 9, 1997 rather than July 10, 1997 in accordance with respondent's expressed preference, amply justifies Family Court's rejection of respondent's claim that he failed to appear on July 9 because he mistakenly believed the hearing had been scheduled for July 10 on the ground that he was not credible. We would also note respondent's well-established penchant for missing court dates (see, Haas v Haas,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF DELAOZ v. DELAOZ
268 A.D.2d 207 (2000)
700 N.Y.S.2d 679
In the Matter of ERCILIA DELAOZ, Respondent, v. MODESTO DELAOZ, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 4, 2000.
Decided January 4, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
