Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was deprived of his right to testify before the Grand Jury was properly denied. The record establishes that the People afforded defendant a reasonable opportunity to testify but that his counsel unjustifiably refused to even discuss scheduling arrangements (see, People v Cates,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. PEARSON
269 A.D.2d 205 (2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 719
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RODERICK PEARSON, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 10, 2000.
Decided February 10, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.