1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 96 F.Supp.2d
  5. 96 F.Supp.2d 376 (2000)
 

GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL CORP. v. MONSANTO CO.

No. Civ.A. 00-043-RRM.

96 F.Supp.2d 376 (2000)

GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO COMPANY and Sweet Technologies, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

May 25, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Lafferty, Jessica Zeldin, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Delaware, H. Roderic Heard, John L. Eisel, Thomas M. Lynch, Tina M. Caravette, Samuel S. Cohen, Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, Chicago, Illinois, for plaintiff.

Richard L. Horwitz, John M. Seaman, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, John W. Treece, Sheila A. Sundvall, Sidley & Austin, Chicago, Illinois, for defendants.

OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

This is a securities case. Plaintiff Great Lakes Chemical Corporation is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Indianapolis, Indiana. Defendants Monsanto Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Sweet Technologies, Inc. ("STI"), are Delaware corporations with their principal places of business in St. Louis, Missouri.

On May 3, 1999, Great Lakes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases