The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence amply supported a reasonable inference that defendant acted as a "screener" or "doorman" when he admitted the undercover officer to the locked drug location and directed him "upstairs" after ascertaining that the officer was seeking to purchase...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.