Defendant's excuse for not opposing plaintiffs' motion to strike his answer for willful noncompliance with a disclosure order—that he believed that the filing of his personal bankruptcy proceeding discharged plaintiffs' fraudulent conveyance claim—is not credible, particularly since the document demand underlying the disclosure order was made at least six months before defendant even filed for bankruptcy, and the disclosure order itself preceded the filing by...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
