Plaintiff's principal's subjective interpretation of the parties' preliminary discussions fails to raise an issue of fact as to the formation of an oral joint venture. Nor is such an issue raised by plaintiff's April 30, 1998 letter to defendants, which, if anything, shows that the parties did not intend to be bound to each other without a further, lawyer-prepared writing (see, Chatterjee Fund Mgt. v Dimensional Media Assocs.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
S.L.S.M.C., INC. v. BRUCE S. BRICKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
277 A.D.2d 184 (2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 662
S.L.S.M.C., INC., Appellant, v. BRUCE S. BRICKMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Respondents. (And a Counterclaim Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 30, 2000.
Decided November 30, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
